I've used 25 different series of historical records to create various indexes to mental asylum patients and people who were suspected of being of unsound mind. Names from some of the indexes are already on my Web site, but many more will be added soon.
QUESTION (it only applies to those series, not my other indexes):
Would you like me to put those names on my Web site in one alphabetical list, with separate Web pages for names beginning with each letter of the alphabet?
Or should I leave things as they are, with separate indexes for different 'mental' series, and (on my Web site) separate lists of names?
(Comments are now closed. This post first appeared on https://qld-genealogy.blogspot.com/2017/10/mental-patients-one-list-or-separate.html.)
This is about family history research in Queensland, Australia. There are articles about sources, problem-solving research techniques, interesting items at Qld State Archives and elsewhere, and specific individuals (some of whom are mentioned in very unexpected sources). Explore the options in the tabs below, in the sidebar and at the bottom of the page, and visit my main Web site.
Thanks for your comment, John. 90% of the people who have replied so far (via social media or private email) want one big list of names instead of a separate list for each record type (which is what's currently on the Web site). Anyone who hasn't thoroughly explored all of my 'insanity' Web pages probably doesn't realise that a combined list would have more than 10,000 names. My personal opinion is that users would find that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages, but I will give serious consideration to making the change if that's what people really want.
ReplyDelete